Back to Blog
The SIA receives thousands of complaints and reports each year. Most operatives never find out what the process looks like from the inside — until they are in it.
After fourteen years in the Metropolitan Police, including involvement in professional standards matters, I have seen how investigative processes work on both sides. The SIA's process has its own specifics, but the underlying dynamic is consistent: the quality of your contemporaneous documentation determines the outcome more than almost anything else.
Here is what happens, and what you need to have in place.
How a Complaint Reaches the SIA
Complaints can be made by members of the public directly through the SIA's online reporting system. They can also come from police, from employers, from venue managers, or from anyone who believes a licensed operative has behaved in a way that raises fitness-to-hold concerns.
The SIA also monitors court proceedings, press reporting, and police intelligence. You do not have to be convicted of anything for a complaint to be opened. An allegation, a civil claim, or a pattern of reported behaviour is enough to trigger a review.
What the SIA Does With a Complaint
The SIA conducts an initial assessment to determine whether the information suggests the operative may not be fit and proper to hold a licence. If it does, an investigation is opened.
During investigation, the SIA may request your account of events, supporting documentation, employer records, police reports, and CCTV footage. They may also interview witnesses.
If the SIA concludes that public safety could be at risk, they have the power to suspend your licence immediately while the investigation continues. You do not have to be charged with a criminal offence. The SIA operates on a civil standard — the balance of probabilities — not the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.
What They Will Ask You For
Your account of the incident. Any contemporaneous records made at the time — incident reports, monitoring logs, notebook entries. CCTV footage if available. Witness details. Your employer's records of the incident.
If your contemporaneous records are detailed, specific, and consistent with any other evidence, they support your account. If they are vague, incomplete, or do not exist, your account rests on your word alone — against a complaint that was specific enough to trigger an investigation.
The Gap That Decides Most Cases
In the majority of SIA complaint outcomes I have seen or heard about, the operative who came out well had one thing the operative who did not had: a detailed contemporaneous record made at the time of the incident.
Not a statement written after the complaint was received. Not a reconstruction from memory weeks later. A record made in the moment, timestamped, signed, and unalterable.
The SIA knows the difference. So does anyone else who has handled investigations.
If a Complaint Is Made Against You
Cooperate with the SIA's process. Take legal advice — the SIA's process has formal rights attached and you should understand them. And retrieve every piece of contemporaneous documentation from the incident in question immediately, before anything is overwritten, lost, or becomes unavailable.
If your records are on Original Note, they are server-timestamped, cryptographically sealed, and exportable as a court-ready PDF from the moment of submission. They cannot be altered after the fact — which means they carry the weight that contemporaneous records are supposed to carry.
Try Original Note free for 7 days. No credit card required.
Or download our free SIA incident report template to understand the documentation standard the SIA expects.